Just finished reading an article on Mercola.com that prompted me to post this…is a subject I covered somewhat in my equine nutrition book although I did not refer to it specifically as “biological farming”, nor did I go into it to this depth, which is something I’ve wanted to do for some time. These same principles apply to animal health as well as human health – we are all dependent upon the soil to grow food that nourishes us on all levels, regardless of whether we eat just vegetables or include meat and/or animal products in our diet. All life on this planet is connected – we seem to forget that in the one-eyed reductionist mentality that permeates modern science.
Our nutrition begins with the soil…the plants growing in the soil are consumed by humans either directly or indirectly via meat and animal products. Conventional farming methods concentrate only on yield, this methodology cares nothing for the “food source” of the crops themselves; that aspect is considered irrelevant. Andre Voisin said (1):
The “dust” of our cells is the dust of the soil. We should frequently meditate on the words of Ash Wednesday: “Man, remember that you are dust and that you will return to dust.” This is not merely a religious and philosophical doctrine but a great scientific truth which should be engraved above the entrance to every Faculty of Medicine throughout the world. … If these “dusts” have been wrongly assembled in plant, animal or human cells, the result will be the imperfect functioning of the latter.
I honestly don’t know how we have “forgotten” that plants are living organisms that have relationships with their environment – yes, plants do communicate! I posted a fascinating video a while back about how plants “talk” – see it here. I suppose it is the ego-based attitude that humans can not only control nature but can do things better than nature can. Unfortunately we are in the midst of a rude awakening about that – at least some of us are. Several enlightened individuals such as William Albrecht, Carey Reams, Rudolf Steiner (and Goethe before him), Lady Eve Balfour, Sir Albert Howard, Weston A. Price, and more recently Harvey Lisle, Michael Astera, Jerry Brunetti, and others have been writing, practicing, and teaching about the link between soil health and our health, and how that link influences virtually all of life. Almost all of these people were/are scientists who had/have the capability of “seeing” phenomenological relationships…even if they might not have used those terms (except for Goethe & Steiner who certainly did). Yet they are shunned by “allopathic” science as not being “real”. I do not disregard mainstream reductionist science as do many “holistic” practitioners/teachers, because I understand (as did Goethe, Steiner, et al) that you have to be able to break the whole down into its parts in order to be able to then actually “see” the whole. It is not a “sum of the parts is greater than the whole” as much of holistic science would have you believe; nor does each individual part work by itself as mainstream science would have you believe. The truth lies in the relationship of the parts to the whole. So it is exciting to me when I read articles (or books) such as this that demonstrate this kind of “seeing” – this kind of conscious awakening.
Now…I am going to go out on a limb here and say something that most of you reading this will likely disagree with – at least at first blush. Organically grown food is NOT necessarily more nutritious than conventionally grown food. What??? You must be insane! Before you virtually tar and feather me, read on. There is absolutely no doubt that organically grown food is better than food that has been sprayed with chemicals. But…most organic growers concentrate on building soil tilth – I know, I used to be a small commercial organic grower and was rather active at one point in my local organic association (before the USDA “bought” the word organic). There is nothing wrong with building humus in the soil; the problem is humus alone does not provide nutrition for the plants growing in that soil. And the whole concept of “organic” is actually a negative one inasmuch as it considers what is NOT in your food (pesticides, herbicides, etc). What I have come to realize is that we are missing very key elements in our food. Why do you think the supplement industry is so huge? Our soils are depleted. What most people don’t realize is what they are depleted of. Minerals, plain and simple. Minerals cannot be added back by simply tilling in the fall crop of leaves or compost or what-have-you. Yes, there may be some elements that are added back…but by and far the soils at least in this country (if not most of the developed world) have been so heavily farmed without ever putting back what was taken out that there is nothing left. Why do you think conventional agriculture tends to keep such a strong-hold on our food supply? Yes, there are many other factors involved, but the bottom line is you can produce a more “nutritious” vegetable by directly feeding the plant – according to lab analysis. What is missing from this picture however is the quality and how the nutrients are utilized by the body – lab analyses only give you quantities. All of us in the animal world – humans included – were designed to ingest our minerals that have been assimilated first by the plant kingdom. Plain and simple. Minerals are the electromagnetic means of communication between the soil and the plant kingdom. Remember what I said above that it is more the relationship between entities than it is the entities themselves that drive responses? It is the relationship between the plant and the soil that dictates what the plant will become – a purveyor of health or simply something to ingest. Taking and taking, never giving back = depletion.
Samuel Hahnemann gave us a medical system over two centuries ago called Heilkunst, or “art of healing” in a rather crude translation. Within that he recognized certain “miasms” or chronic, many times inherited diseases. Those that have worked to bring his medical system into present times have recognized the “cancer” miasm, which is a state of mentality more so than the conventional diagnosis of tumor (although the mental state can certainly lead to tumors). The mental state of cancer is one of continuously giving – we can characterize it by the person that continually gives and gives until her physical and spiritual bodies are totally depleted. If the soil keeps giving and giving without having the opportunity to replenish itself – what do you think it will produce? Cancerous causing products.
Harvey Lisle called minerals the “enlivened rock powders”. Why? Because they give life. The soil replenishes itself slowly by the breakdown of rocks. The advent of agriculture put pressures upon this process that would eventually cause severe depletion if these minerals (“rocks”) were not replaced – at state which we have now realized. It is not, at least in my opinion, that so-called “modern” agriculture is a bad thing, it is human greed and inflated ego that has kept us from “seeing” our responsibility. The soil, the plant life, the animal life…are all available to us to utilize as we need – and that is the key…use as needed. In a loving caring, nurturing way. However we treat the soil, we treat ourselves.
(1) Quote from front matter of The Enlivened Rock Powders, Harvey Lisle, 1994, Acres USA.